Live tracker · kept up to date

STARCRAFT — everything we know

Blizzard announced STARCRAFT at BlizzCon 2026 on 12 September: an open-world shooter set in the Koprulu Sector, landing Spring 2030. It is not the StarCraft 3 real-time strategy game the series has been waiting for, and Blizzard has never called it StarCraft 3. Everything confirmed so far is below, and so is everything that is still open.

Studio: Blizzard EntertainmentGenre: Open-world shooterRelease: Spring 2030Platforms: unconfirmed
Latest updates ↓
Last updated: 13 September 2026
StatusAnnounced
DeveloperBlizzard Entertainment
PublisherBlizzard Entertainment
Project leadDan Hay
GenreOpen-world shooter
SettingThe Koprulu Sector
PerspectiveUnconfirmed
ModesUnconfirmed
PlatformsNot in the announcement
EngineUnconfirmed
ReleaseSpring 2030
First shownBlizzCon 2026 · 12 September 2026
Timeline

Every STARCRAFT update so far

13 September 2026 · Interview
Hay calls it a box product, and names the one gameplay detail so far

Project lead Dan Hay used the BlizzCon press interviews to fill in what the cinematic left out. STARCRAFT is “a box product” — a narrative-driven open-world shooter whose “story has a beginning, a middle, and an end” — not a live service. You “create a character, name them, and follow that character’s story”, which is the only thing anyone has said about how you actually play it. He put the setting 70 years after the previous story, and on the wait he said “the date is a frame, and we’re very serious about it” and called it “a date that we feel really confident about”. None of this is in the announcement post, but it is Blizzard on the record, not a report.

12 September 2026 · Announcement
STARCRAFT revealed at the BlizzCon opening ceremony for Spring 2030

Blizzard opened the BlizzCon 2026 opening ceremony with a cinematic and a short announcement post: “From the farthest reaches of the stars, a new mission calls. Return to the Koprulu Sector when STARCRAFT, an original open-world shooter, lands Spring 2030. There’s only one thing we can say: it’s about damn time.” No gameplay, no platforms, no subtitle and no number in the title. On stage Hay called it “something new: an open-world shooter where every step is earned. Not from above, but down on the ground, in the mud, in the fire.”

4 September 2026 · Alternate reality game
Players decode hidden logs in the StarCraft site’s code

Days before the reveal, glitches on the official StarCraft site turned out to be encoded logs sitting in the page source. Players pulled them apart: entries stamped 2575, the Aokara Lunar Mining Complex on Roxara, a Theta Squadron callsign and fourteen unidentified motion signatures. Blizzard has never acknowledged the whole thing, so read it as a community find rather than an official teaser. It is also where the community first put a number on the time jump — the 70-year figure came later, from Hay.

2 September 2026 · Report
A Korean report ties Nexon to a StarCraft RTS

Chosun Ilbo reported that Blizzard and Nexon were close to finalising a licensing and development deal for a real-time strategy sequel, that work had already started, and that map modder Choi Jun-ho would lead it. Nothing about it was mentioned at BlizzCon, Blizzard has not commented, and no second outlet has confirmed it independently. It sits here because the RTS question is the one every StarCraft player is actually asking, and this is the only thread pointing at an answer.

Confirmed

What Blizzard has actually said

One cinematic, one release window, one genre label. That is the whole confirmed set, and the gap between it and what people are reading into it is wide enough to be worth walking through line by line.

Spring 2030
Release window
3:07
Announce cinematic
0s
Gameplay shown
70 yrs
After the last story · Hay

The new StarCraft game is called STARCRAFT, and it is not StarCraft 3

The title carries no number and no subtitle. Blizzard’s own wording is “an original open-world shooter”, which reads as a deliberate reset rather than a sequel to StarCraft II. The “StarCraft 3” framing comes from headlines and search habits, not from Blizzard. Two other names doing the rounds are wrong as well: Dominion is the name of the cinematic, and the pipe in “STARCRAFT | Announce Cinematic | Dominion” is Blizzard’s standard trailer naming, not a subtitle. For the record, this is the third attempt at a StarCraft shooter, after Ghost and Project Ares. The franchise has only ever numbered one sequel: the original StarCraft landed in 1998, StarCraft II in 2010, and nothing since.

Dan Hay is running it, and that tells you the shape

Hay spent years at Ubisoft on Far Cry, including Far Cry 5, before joining Blizzard in 2021 to oversee the survival project Odyssey, which was cancelled in January 2024. He is the project lead here, and Blizzard has not named a separate studio, so this is an internal team, reported to be heavy on Blizzard veterans. An open-world shooter run by the Far Cry guy is the least surprising sentence in this whole announcement.

You are a Dominion grunt, seventy years on

Blizzard confirmed the Koprulu Sector and put the Terran Dominion and the Zerg in the cinematic. The seventy-year jump comes from Hay, who said the team set the timeline 70 years after the previous story; the 2575 stamp players decoded before the show lines up with it. Hay’s “not from above, but down on the ground” describes where you stand in the war, not which camera you see it through — you are not a commander this time, and that is as much as anyone has said.

The cinematic is recruitment propaganda, and nothing else

Three minutes and seven seconds of a Dominion marine named Holt being trained, kitted out, loaded up and dropped, closing on a Zergling wave, with a Mengsk voice coming over the loudspeakers. Blizzard’s copy for it reads “The sons and daughters of the Dominion answered the call when mankind needed them most. Their courage held the line. Their sacrifice bought us another day. Now the call comes to you.” It signs off on “JOIN THE DOMINION — STARCRAFT.COM”. There is no gameplay in it, no UI, and no shot of anyone doing anything a player would do.

An open world shooter that is single-player, finite, and yours to name

Hay calls it a box product with a beginning, a middle and an end, balancing story missions against open-world activities at your own pace, and says you create and name your own character and follow their story. That is first-party and on the record. Separate from it, and weaker: before the reveal Jez Corden compared what he had seen to Space Marine 2 and speculated about a Helldivers-style mode, and both he and Jason Schreier were reported as saying it is not a Destiny-style live game. Blizzard itself has said nothing about modes or monetisation.

The RTS question is still open, in both directions

No StarCraft RTS was announced at BlizzCon 2026, and Blizzard did not rule one out either. StarCraft: Remastered and StarCraft II turned up only in the esports programme, in the Blizzard Classic Cup alongside Heroes of the Storm and Warcraft III: Reforged. The Nexon report from early September is the only thread pointing at a strategy game, and it is a single Korean newspaper with no confirmation attached. If a StarCraft 3 RTS exists, nothing at this show acknowledged it.

Spring 2030 is three and a half years out, and that is the point

Announcing a window this far ahead is unusual, and Hay leaned into it: the date shows “that we’re serious”, it is “a date that we feel really confident about”, and “the community has been waiting for a long time”. The flip side is what the reveal did not contain, and the StarCraft universe has spent a decade running on rumors instead of releases. Three and a half years of runway, a cinematic, and a genre label is a thin package, and the loudest reaction at the show was to exactly that.

Who STARCRAFT is for

Pick it up if
  • You want to be inside the Koprulu sector rather than looking down on it
  • Far Cry-shaped open worlds with a finite story are your thing
  • You have wanted a Terran ground-level campaign since StarCraft: Ghost was shelved
  • You are comfortable following a game for three and a half years before you play it
Maybe skip it if
  • You came for base building, macro and a ladder — this is not that game
  • You want to play Protoss or Zerg; nobody has said you can
  • You need to know the platform before you care
  • Announcements without gameplay do nothing for you

Still unconfirmed: platforms beyond Xbox UK naming Xbox console, first- or third-person camera, co-op and PvP, monetisation, engine, the studio name, which factions are playable, the exact release month, and whether any beta or playtest is planned. Beyond the Xbox console mention there is no Steam page and no Battle.net product page. Three tiers run through the text above: Blizzard’s announcement post, Blizzard staff on the record, and third-party reports — each one is named where it is used.

FAQ

StarCraft 3 questions, answered

Is StarCraft 3 confirmed?

No. Blizzard announced a game called STARCRAFT, with no number and no subtitle, and described it as “an original open-world shooter”. No StarCraft 3 real-time strategy game has been announced, and Blizzard has never used the name StarCraft 3.

When does the new StarCraft come out?

Spring 2030. That is Blizzard’s own wording in the BlizzCon 2026 announcement. No month and no day have been given, so nothing more precise exists yet.

Is the new StarCraft an RTS?

No. It is an open-world shooter. Blizzard did not announce a strategy game at BlizzCon 2026 and did not rule one out either, so the RTS question stands unanswered.

Who is making STARCRAFT?

Blizzard Entertainment, internally, with Dan Hay leading the project. Hay previously worked on Far Cry at Ubisoft and led Blizzard’s cancelled survival game Odyssey. No separate studio name has been given.

What platforms is STARCRAFT coming to?

Blizzard’s announcement names no platforms. Xbox UK’s own channels named Xbox console after the show, and one outlet reported PC alongside it. PlayStation has not been addressed either way, and Blizzard has published nothing.

Is STARCRAFT first-person or third-person?

Unconfirmed. Blizzard has not said, and coverage contradicts itself — some outlets wrote first-person, others third-person, and pre-reveal reports said third-person. Hay’s “down on the ground, in the mud” is about where you fight, not about the camera. No gameplay has been shown.

Does STARCRAFT have co-op or multiplayer?

Unconfirmed. Blizzard disclosed no modes and no monetisation. Hay has called it a box product with a finite story in which you create and follow your own character, which points hard at a single-player campaign, but he never said whether anything else ships with it.

When is STARCRAFT set?

In the Koprulu Sector, seventy years after the previous story — Hay’s own figure, which puts it well past StarCraft II: Legacy of the Void and past Nova Covert Ops. The logs players decoded from the StarCraft site before the show were stamped 2575 and line up with that gap. Blizzard’s announcement itself gives no date in the fiction.

Can you play Protoss or Zerg?

Nobody has said so. StarCraft has always run on three asymmetric factions — Terran, Protoss and Zerg — and all three are reported to feature. The cinematic follows a Terran Dominion marine named Holt fighting the Zerg, and Hay says you create your own character, which reads as Terran. Playable factions have not been discussed.

Is there STARCRAFT gameplay to watch?

Not yet. The only official footage is the three-minute announce cinematic, and it contains no gameplay at all — no UI, no combat from a player’s viewpoint. Anything labelled as gameplay right now is not from Blizzard.